Effective July 1, 2023 (HB 1301), Florida law presumes that equal (50/50) time-sharing is in the best interest of the child. It is a rebuttable presumption, not an automatic rule — a court can order a different schedule if a parent proves 50/50 is not in the child's best interest.
Which Florida Statutes Govern Time-Sharing and Parenting Plans? (§ 61.13, eff. 1 July 2023)
Since 1 July 2023, Fla. Stat. § 61.13(2)(c)1. has carried a rebuttable presumption that equal time-sharing is in a child’s best interests. Every proposition below is tied to the pinpoint subsection that supports it. Links go to the official text published by the Florida Legislature.
§ 61.13(2)(c)1. — creates a rebuttable presumption, effective 1 July 2023, that equal time-sharing is in the minor child’s best interests; a party must rebut it by a preponderance of the evidence.
§ 61.13(2)(b) — sets the mandatory minimum contents of a parenting plan: daily tasks, time-sharing schedule, designated decision-making, communication methods, and exchange locations.
§ 61.13(2)(c) — requires a “substantial and material change of circumstances” before a parenting plan or time-sharing schedule can be modified.
§ 61.13(2)(c)2. — requires shared parental responsibility unless the court finds it would be detrimental to the child.
§ 61.13(2)(c)7. — guarantees both parents access to the child’s medical, dental, and school records unless a court order revokes it.
§ 61.13(3) — makes best interests the primary consideration and lists the 20 statutory factors in paragraphs (a) through (t).
§ 61.13(3) — also provides that a parent moving to within 50 miles of the other parent may be a substantial and material change supporting modification.
§ 61.13(4)(c)1. — requires the court to award makeup time-sharing when a schedule is denied without proper cause.
§ 61.13(4)(c)2. — permits an award of costs and attorney’s fees against the noncompliant parent.
§ 61.13(5) — confirms that an equal time-sharing order does not preclude a child support order.
§ 61.30(1)(a) — makes the guidelines schedule the presumptive amount of child support.
§ 61.30(11)(b)8. — defines a “substantial amount of time” as at least 20 percent of the overnights in the year.
§ 61.13001 — governs relocation of 50 miles or more for 60 or more consecutive days.
§ 61.14 — governs modification and enforcement of support after the judgment.
§ 61.16 — governs attorney’s fee awards between the parties.
§ 44.102(2)(c) — requires referral of custody, visitation, and parental-responsibility disputes to family mediation, with an exception where domestic violence would compromise the process.
§§ 61.501–61.542 — the UCCJEA governs which state has jurisdiction over the parenting issues.
§ 61.183 — governs mediation of contested parenting issues; the records exemption is in subsection (3).
§ 44.405 — establishes mediation confidentiality and the mediation privilege, and its exceptions.
§ 61.052 — supplies the ground for the underlying dissolution in which the parenting plan was entered.
§ 61.075(1) — divides property from an equal premise, on a track separate from the time-sharing analysis.
§ 61.13(2)(a) — allows the court to approve or modify a parenting plan even when the child is not physically present in Florida, where the child was removed to avoid the court’s jurisdiction.
§ 61.13(2)(b)2. — requires the plan to specify the time the child spends with each parent.
§ 61.13(2)(b)5. — requires the plan to designate authorized exchange locations unless both parents agree otherwise in writing.
§ 61.13(4)(a) — bars a parent owed support from refusing to honor the time-sharing schedule because support was not paid.
§ 61.13(4)(b) — requires a parent whose time-sharing was violated to keep paying ordered support.
§ 61.13(6) — bars denial of shared parental responsibility or time-sharing solely because a parent is or is believed to be HIV positive.
“Unless otherwise provided in this section or agreed to by the parties, there is a rebuttable presumption that equal time-sharing of a minor child is in the best interests of the minor child. To rebut this presumption, a party must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that equal time-sharing is not in the best interests of the minor child.” — Fla. Stat. § 61.13(2)(c)1.
“A determination of parental responsibility, a parenting plan, or a time-sharing schedule may not be modified without a showing of a substantial and material change in circumstances and a determination that the modification is in the best interests of the child.” — Fla. Stat. § 61.13(3)
“If the parents of a child are residing greater than 50 miles apart at the time of the entry of the last order establishing time-sharing and a parent moves within 50 miles of the other parent, then that move may be considered a substantial and material change in circumstances.” — Fla. Stat. § 61.13(3)
Answers to the Questions the Statute Actually Decides
Is 50/50 time-sharing automatic in Florida after § 61.13(2)(c)1.?
No. It is a rebuttable presumption, not a mandate. The starting point is equal time-sharing, and a parent who wants a different schedule must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that equal time-sharing is not in the child’s best interests, measured against the 20 factors in § 61.13(3).
What is a “substantial and material change in circumstances”?
It is the threshold § 61.13(3) imposes before any parenting plan or time-sharing schedule can be modified. The change generally must be significant, material, and not reasonably contemplated when the last order was entered, and the modification must independently serve the child’s best interests.
Does moving closer to the other parent count as a change under § 61.13(3)?
It can. Where the parents lived more than 50 miles apart when the last time-sharing order was entered and one parent moves within 50 miles of the other, the statute allows the court to treat that move as a substantial and material change supporting modification.
How many overnights matter for child support under § 61.30(11)(b)8.?
At least 20 percent of the overnights in the year. That is the statutory definition of a “substantial amount of time,” and reaching it changes the guideline calculation.
Statutory authority checked against the 2025 Florida Statutes on 6 August 2026.
Quick answer: Effective July 1, 2023 (House Bill 1301), Florida law
presumes that equal — 50/50 — time-sharing is in the best interest of the child.
It is a rebuttable presumption under Fla. Stat. § 61.13: the 50/50 split is the
starting point, and a parent who wants a different schedule must prove, by a preponderance of the
evidence, that equal time-sharing is not in the child's best interest.
In 2023, Florida significantly changed how courts decide parenting time. House Bill 1301,
effective July 1, 2023, amended Fla. Stat. § 61.13 to create a
rebuttable presumption of equal time-sharing. This guide explains what that means in
plain English for South Florida parents.
1. What changed in 2023
Before the reform, Florida's statute said there was no presumption for or against any
particular time-sharing schedule — judges started from a blank slate. HB 1301 replaced that with a
clear default: equal 50/50 time-sharing is presumed to be in the child's best interest.
The change is found in the amended HB 1301
and § 61.13.
2. What a “rebuttable presumption” actually means
“Rebuttable” is the key word. A 50/50 schedule is now the starting point,
but it is not guaranteed. A parent who believes equal time-sharing is wrong for their child can ask the
court for a different schedule — but that parent carries the burden of proof and
must show, by a preponderance of the evidence (more likely than not), that 50/50 is not
in the child's best interest.
3. How the presumption is overcome (best-interest factors)
Courts weigh the statutory best-interest factors in Fla. Stat. § 61.13(3). Common reasons
a 50/50 schedule may not be appropriate include:
A history of domestic violence, abuse, neglect, or abandonment.
Substance abuse or untreated mental-health issues affecting parenting.
The distance between the parents' homes making equal exchanges impractical (especially for school-age children).
A parent's work schedule or availability to actually exercise equal time.
Each parent's demonstrated ability to provide a stable, consistent routine and to support the child's relationship with the other parent.
4. Does it change an existing parenting plan?
The presumption applies to cases pending or filed on or after July 1, 2023. By itself,
the new law is generally not a reason to reopen a parenting plan that was already final —
modifying an existing order still requires showing a substantial, material, and unanticipated change
in circumstances. Whether the 2023 change applies to a given case has been litigated, so the
specific facts and timing matter. (See the Florida Bar Journal's discussion of retroactivity.)
5. What it means for South Florida parents
For most separating parents, the practical effect is that equal time is now the default expectation,
and the conversation shifts to logistics — school zones, exchange locations, and schedules — rather
than to which parent is “primary.” If you have genuine safety or stability concerns, those still
matter, but you will need evidence to support a departure from 50/50. A well-drafted parenting plan is more
important than ever. See our related guides on
child custody & time-sharing and
modifying a Florida parenting plan.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Florida a 50/50 custody state now?
As of July 1, 2023, Florida presumes equal 50/50 time-sharing is in the child's best interest. It is a
rebuttable presumption, so a court can still order a different schedule when the evidence supports it.
How do I get more than 50% time-sharing?
You must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that a 50/50 schedule is not in your child's best
interest under the § 61.13(3) factors — for example, distance, a parent's availability, or a
history of abuse or substance misuse.
Does the new law change my current parenting plan?
Not automatically. It applies to cases pending or filed on/after July 1, 2023; changing a final plan still
requires a substantial, material, unanticipated change in circumstances.
Worried about how the 50/50 presumption affects your case? Pazos Law Group — bilingual (EN/ES) Florida family law. Confidential consultations. Schedule a Consultation →or call (305) 482-1262
Sources
Fla. Stat. § 61.13 (2023, as amended by HB 1301); Florida Legislature, CS/HB 1301 (2023); The Florida
Bar Journal, “Retroactivity (or Not) of the Equal Timesharing Presumption.” This article is
general information, not legal advice; consult a licensed Florida attorney about your situation.
Speak with a Florida Family Law Attorney
Tell us about your situation and Nadia Pazos will follow up personally — confidential, bilingual EN/ES. Prefer to call? (305) 482-1262.
★★★★★ 4.6 on Google · 50+ reviews · AV Preeminent® (Martindale-Hubbell) · 20+ years · Hablamos Español