EN ES

Executive Compensation in Florida Divorce — Stock Options, RSUs, and Deferred Comp

For executives, founders, and corporate professionals, a substantial portion of net worth often comes from stock options, restricted stock units (RSUs), performance shares, deferred compensation, and carried interest. These are not the same as cash — and Florida divorce law treats them with specific rules that can dramatically change outcomes.

Quick Answer

Governing authority: Fla. Stat. § 61.075(1) (the equal-distribution starting premise); Fla. Stat. § 61.075(7) (the classification cut-off date).

Equity compensation earned during the marriage is generally marital under Fla. Stat. § 61.075. Unvested equity is allocated between marital and non-marital portions using a coverture formula that compares the period of service during the marriage to the total vesting period. Performance-based grants add complexity because future vesting depends on outcomes not yet known.

Which Florida Statutes Govern Equitable Distribution? (§ 61.075, as amended by ch. 2024-237)

Property division runs through Fla. Stat. § 61.075(1), which requires the court to begin from an equal split. The 2024 amendment (ch. 2024-237, effective 1 July 2024) added the closely-held-business valuation rules. Every proposition below is tied to the pinpoint subsection that supports it. Links go to the official text published by the Florida Legislature.

  • § 61.075(1) — requires the court to set apart each spouse’s nonmarital property and to begin distribution from the premise that it should be equal, absent justification for an unequal split.
  • § 61.075(1)(a)–(j) — lists the factors that can justify an unequal distribution, including contributions, economic circumstances, duration, career interruption, and the desirability of keeping a business intact.
  • § 61.075(1)(i) — makes intentional dissipation, waste, depletion, or destruction of marital assets a factor when it occurs after filing or within 2 years before filing.
  • § 61.075(3) — requires specific written findings identifying nonmarital assets, valuing significant marital assets, and assigning liabilities in any contested case without a stipulation.
  • § 61.075(5) — permits an interim partial distribution on a sworn motion showing extraordinary circumstances.
  • § 61.075(6)(a)1.b — makes the enhancement in value and appreciation of a nonmarital asset marital when it results from either party’s marital effort or the expenditure of marital funds.
  • § 61.075(6)(a)1.c — supplies the coverture-fraction formula for the marital share of passive appreciation where marital funds paid down a mortgage on nonmarital real property.
  • § 61.075(6)(a)1.e — makes all vested and nonvested retirement, pension, profit-sharing, annuity, deferred compensation, and insurance benefits accrued during the marriage marital assets.
  • § 61.075(6)(a)1.f — sets fair market value as the standard of value for a closely held business and makes enterprise goodwill a marital asset the court must value.
  • § 61.075(6)(a)2. — presumes real property held as tenants by the entireties is marital, whenever acquired.
  • § 61.075(6)(b) — defines nonmarital assets: premarital property, noninterspousal gifts and inheritances, income from nonmarital assets not treated as marital, and assets excluded by valid written agreement.
  • § 61.075(7) — fixes the cut-off date for classification as the earlier of a valid separation agreement or the filing of the petition, while leaving the valuation date to the judge.
  • § 61.075(8) — presumes assets acquired and liabilities incurred after the date of marriage are marital, rebuttable by a showing to the contrary.
  • § 61.075(9) — permits equitable distribution without regard to alimony, with alimony considered afterward.
  • § 61.075(11) — abolishes special equity, which must now be pleaded as unequal distribution or as enhancement in value.
  • § 61.076 — governs the distribution of retirement, pension, profit-sharing, annuity, and deferred compensation plans.
  • § 61.16 — governs attorney’s and expert fee awards, including forensic accounting costs.
  • § 61.08(1)(a) — governs the alimony forms considered after the estate is divided.
  • Thompson v. Thompson, 576 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 1991) — the Florida Supreme Court decision on enterprise goodwill in a professional practice.
  • Kaaa v. Kaaa, 58 So. 3d 867 (Fla. 2010) — the Florida Supreme Court decision on the marital share of passive appreciation, now codified at § 61.075(6)(a)1.c.
  • § 61.021 — requires 6 months of Florida residency before the petition that fixes the classification cut-off date.
  • § 61.052 — supplies the ground — an irretrievably broken marriage — for the dissolution in which the estate is divided.
  • § 61.19 — bars entry of the final judgment dividing the estate until at least 20 days after the petition is filed, absent a showing that the delay would cause injustice.
  • § 61.071 — authorizes temporary support and suit money while valuation and financial discovery proceed.
  • § 61.30(2) — supplies the net income definitions applied when a divided asset produces income.
  • § 61.14 — equitable distribution is final once entered, while support obligations remain modifiable under this section.
  • § 44.102(2)(c) — refers parenting disputes to family mediation, the forum in which most property settlements are also negotiated.

Source: Florida Legislature, 2025 Florida Statutes. Fla. Stat. ch. 61 Fla. Stat. ch. 61

“in distributing the marital assets and liabilities between the parties, the court must begin with the premise that the distribution should be equal, unless there is a justification for an unequal distribution based on all relevant factors” — Fla. Stat. § 61.075(1)
“If there is goodwill separate and distinct from the continued presence and reputation of the owner spouse, it is considered enterprise goodwill, which is a marital asset that must be valued by the court.” — Fla. Stat. § 61.075(6)(a)1.f
“The cut-off date for determining assets and liabilities to be identified or classified as marital assets and liabilities is the earliest of the date the parties enter into a valid separation agreement, such other date as may be expressly established by such agreement, or the date of the filing of a petition for dissolution of marriage.” — Fla. Stat. § 61.075(7)
“The intentional dissipation, waste, depletion, or destruction of marital assets after the filing of the petition or within 2 years prior to the filing of the petition.” — Fla. Stat. § 61.075(1)(i)

Answers to the Questions the Statute Actually Decides

Does Florida split everything 50/50 under § 61.075(1)?

Not automatically. The statute requires the court to begin from the premise of an equal distribution, then permits an unequal split where the factors in paragraphs (a) through (j) justify it. Nonmarital property is set apart first and is not divided at all.

What date fixes whether an asset is marital under § 61.075(7)?

Classification is fixed at the earliest of a valid separation agreement, a date the agreement expressly sets, or the filing of the petition. Valuation is a separate question — the same subsection lets the judge pick whatever valuation date is just and equitable, and different assets may be valued on different dates.

Is business goodwill divisible in a Florida divorce?

Enterprise goodwill is. § 61.075(6)(a)1.f, added by ch. 2024-237 effective 1 July 2024, makes goodwill that exists separate and distinct from the owner spouse’s continued presence and reputation a marital asset the court must value. The statute uses the term “enterprise goodwill”; the phrase “personal goodwill” appears nowhere in it.

What happens if a spouse wastes or hides marital assets?

§ 61.075(1)(i) makes intentional dissipation, waste, depletion, or destruction of marital assets a statutory factor supporting an unequal distribution, and it reaches conduct within the 2 years before the petition was filed, not just conduct after filing.

Statutory authority checked against the 2025 Florida Statutes on 6 August 2026.

The Four Categories of Executive Compensation

Most equity programs fall into four buckets, each treated differently:

1. Vested Stock Options (ISOs and NSOs)

Stock options that have vested are mature assets — the executive has the right to exercise them. Value is typically the difference between the strike price and current fair market value, less expected taxes on exercise.

2. Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)

RSUs are promises of company stock that vest over time. Once vested, they become company shares.

The Florida analysis is similar to stock options: granted during marriage + vested during marriage = fully marital. Unvested RSUs are apportioned using coverture.

3. Performance Shares and PSUs

Performance shares vest based on company or executive performance over a defined period (often 3 years). The marital portion depends on:

4. Deferred Compensation and Carried Interest

Deferred compensation arrangements (NQDC plans, SERPs) often have vesting schedules tied to length of service. Marital portion = service during the marriage / total service.

Carried interest (for fund managers and private equity professionals) is one of the most complex compensation forms. The grant, vesting, and ultimate realization are typically separated by years. Each step requires analysis.

The Coverture Formula

For unvested equity granted during or before the marriage, Florida courts often use a coverture formula to allocate marital vs. non-marital portions. The basic formula:

Marital fraction = Months of vesting during marriage / Total months of vesting

Example: A grant of 10,000 RSUs vests over 4 years (48 months). 24 months of vesting occurred during the marriage. Marital fraction = 24/48 = 50%. Of the 10,000 RSUs, 5,000 are marital and 5,000 are non-marital.

This is the most common approach but not the only one. Some grants have specific service requirements that may justify a different allocation. Performance-based vesting may require an adjusted approach.

Valuation Methods

Three valuation approaches are common:

  1. Intrinsic value (in-the-money). Strike price compared to fair market value at the valuation date. Simple but ignores option time value.
  2. Black-Scholes / option pricing model. Accounts for time value, volatility, and other factors. More accurate for stock options.
  3. Pay-as-received. Rather than valuing upfront, the order requires distribution of equity proceeds as they vest. Avoids valuation disputes but extends the financial entanglement.

Tax Implications

Tax treatment varies dramatically by equity type:

Settlement structures should account for tax. The party receiving an equalizing payment in equity is taking on different tax exposure than the party receiving cash.

Strategy

  1. Get the equity plans. Award agreements, vesting schedules, and plan documents are essential.
  2. Identify grant dates and vesting periods. The coverture analysis turns on these.
  3. Consider deferred-distribution orders. For complex grants, ordering distribution at vesting often avoids valuation disputes.
  4. Coordinate with tax counsel. Equity has tax implications that vary widely.
  5. Address future grants. What about grants made after the divorce filing but before judgment? The order should specify treatment.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are unvested stock options marital in Florida?

Partially. Unvested options granted during the marriage are typically allocated between marital and non-marital portions using a coverture formula based on the months of vesting that occurred during the marriage versus the total vesting period.

How do I value stock options in a Florida divorce?

Three common approaches: (1) intrinsic value — the difference between strike price and market value, (2) Black-Scholes or similar option pricing model that accounts for time value and volatility, and (3) deferred distribution — the court orders distribution of proceeds as the options vest. The right approach depends on the option type and the parties' goals.

What is the coverture formula?

The coverture formula allocates unvested equity between marital and non-marital portions. The basic formula is: marital fraction = months of vesting during marriage / total months of vesting. So if 24 months of a 48-month vest occurred during the marriage, 50% of the unvested equity is marital.

Do I have to share my signing bonus in a Florida divorce?

A signing bonus is generally marital if received during the marriage. If the bonus requires future service to retain (a 'clawback' period), the portion attributable to post-divorce service may be non-marital.

What about carried interest from my private equity or hedge fund work?

Carried interest is among the most complex equity types in Florida divorce. The marital portion typically depends on when the carry was granted, when it vested, when the underlying fund realizes gains, and what services were performed during the marriage. Deferred distribution is often the cleanest approach.

Executive Compensation in Your Florida Divorce?

Tell us about your situation and Nadia Pazos will follow up personally — confidential, bilingual EN/ES. Prefer to call? (305) 482-1262.

★★★★★ 4.6 on Google · 50+ reviews · AV Preeminent® (Martindale-Hubbell) · 20+ years · Hablamos Español

Your information is confidential. Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship.

The information on this page is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Florida family law is fact-specific. Reading this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with Pazos Law Group.